Guillaume Gardet - 11:57 22.11.13 wrote:
> 
> Le 22/11/2013 11:47, Michal Hrusecky a écrit :
> > Guillaume Gardet - 10:13 22.11.13 wrote:
> >> Le 22/11/2013 09:55, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Le 22/11/2013 09:12, Michal Hrusecky a écrit :
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> today I tried upgrading openSUSE on my tablet (Tegra2) from 12.3 to 13.1 
> >>>> and I
> >>>> ended up with invalid instruction errors just after update of glibc. My 
> >>>> guess
> >>>> is that glibc was compiled with neon support enabled. Was there any 
> >>>> decision to
> >>>> drop non-neon devices or is it simply a bug? Is it just glibc that has 
> >>>> neon
> >>>> enabled or everything? I know that for 32bits we have two glibc 
> >>>> packages, maybe
> >>>> something similar would be possible for armv7?
> >>>>
> >>> AFAIK, neon should not be enabled by default, so this is a big bug. 
> >>> Someone else noticed this bug few days ago, on a Mirabox (Marvel SoC).
> >>>
> >>> All my ARM boards are neon capable so I cannot test. :(
> >>>
> >>> Maybe Alex, or Dirk, could help here?
> >> Apparently, glibc is now capable of multiarch for armv7. Which mean that 
> >> it can auto-detect if hardware is neon capable, or not. For that, we need 
> >> to build glibc with multi-arch option enabled, which is not the case right 
> >> now. Without multiarch enabled, no tests are performed and assume that 
> >> neon is present.
> >>
> >> I am building glibc with multi-arch enabled.
> >> Once built, could you test if it fix your problem?
> >>
> > Sure!
> >
> 
> Here is the glibc RPM to test:
> http://guillaume.gardet.free.fr/openSUSE/glibc-2.18-4.6.1.armv7hl.rpm
> 
> Not sure it will fix the problem because build log seems to tell multiarch 
> was auto-detected before. But let's try it.
> 
> If rpm, yast or zypper cannot install it, extract it on the SD card.

hmmm, tried it, didn't helped, tried 12.3 glibc, that one helped :-/

-- 
        Michal Hrusecky <[email protected]>
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to