On 28 April 2015 at 03:30, Ludwig Nussel <[email protected]> wrote: > Dirk Müller schrieb: >> >> for a couple of weeks we've been experimenting with native builds for >> aarch64, and are now happy to announce that we consider the current >> state stable enough to announce it as being available. > > > Thanks to that aarch64 now builds in reasonable time and the > automatic snapshoting mechanism that turns Factory into Tumbleweed > has a chance to actually work. However, to determine whether a > snapshot can be created the tools have to look at the overall state > of the project and check if everything has settled. Due to armv6 and > 7 beeing slow that almost never happens for the "local" arch used > for image building. > So I'm wondering whether it would make sense to split aarch64 from > armv6/7 and use a separate project? > Alternatively we could use a frozen project link instead of using > always the latest Factory packagse. That would slow down aarch64 > considerably though. > With the evidence provided, I would vote for splitting aarch64 from armv6/7. Having at least one of the ARM architectures running a full Tumbleweed would be great.
Regards, Andy > cu > Ludwig > > -- > (o_ Ludwig Nussel > //\ > V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer > Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > Maxfeldstraße 5; 90409 Nürnberg; Germany > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected] > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
