Just tested lpae config without CONFIG_EXYNOS_IOMMU on snow, system
boots with black screen same,
then modprobe cros_ec_devs, ptn3460, pwm-samsung makes panel start to
work without kernel panic.

---
Best Regards,
Misha Komarovskiy
zombahatgmaildotcom


On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Misha Komarovskiy <zom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Guillaume,
> I tested both exynos_defconfig and multi_v7_defconfig, they work fine.
> But ill test lpae config without EXYNOS_IOMMU today and will report.
> ---
> Best Regards,
> Misha Komarovskiy
> zombahatgmaildotcom
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Guillaume Gardet
> <guillaume.gar...@free.fr> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le 16/08/2015 21:59, Misha Komarovskiy a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Maybe we can disable only Exynos IOMMU in configs for now? Same way it
>>> is disabled in current exynos_defconfig here
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig?id=6562f3bd396ab6d2c9b455e95c67e33bab73bff5
>>> As i understand it is broken for all exynos devices not only snow.
>>
>>
>> That is exactly what I would like to do since I read this thread:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/17/163
>>
>> Before submitting the idea here, I wanted to check if disabling Exynos IOMMU
>> in config was enough.
>> I had only time to test the exynos_defconfig with openSUSE kernel and it was
>> OK (boot messages and login prompt displayed).
>>
>>
>> Guillaume
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Misha Komarovskiy
>>> zombahatgmaildotcom
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.07.2015 um 15:15 schrieb Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.07.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/23/15 14:43, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.07.2015 um 14:22 schrieb Guillaume Gardet:
>>>>>>>> Maybe some config options compiled as module (which?) and blacklisted
>>>>>>>> for chromebooks could be ok?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe. Someone with a Chromebook needs to sit down and try. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hrm, rather than disable it one way or another manually, couldn't we
>>>>>> just blacklist it inside the kernel? I doubt that we can load iommu as
>>>>>> module...
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean as in patch the iommu probe code to check for "google,snow",
>>>>> "google,spring", etc.?
>>>>
>>>> For example - or remove the respective dt node. Or as a property to the
>>>> IOMMU dt node...
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>>>>> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB
>>>>> 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
>>>> To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
>>>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org

Reply via email to