On Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2017, 13:34:46 CEST wrote Dirk Müller: > Hi Adrian, > > 2017-07-12 13:29 GMT+02:00 Adrian Schröter <[email protected]>: > > > It would just regulary break, because of changes in openSUSE:Factory. > > > > This makes only sense when we plan to submit the changes back to > > openSUSE:Factory. > > Not sure I understand that. 90%+ of the changes we do are in the > DVD5-aarch64.group file, which is by definition conflict free to the > base. I don't see a _servicedata file that would e.g. constantly > conflict.
no, the repo, media and architecture definitions are more likely to conflict. However, it is up to you to try it. Just keep in mind that the source service will not run on underlying changes and you need still manually to merge them. > I would actually welcome the change that the tumblweed team would > maintain the DVD5-aarch64.group file in the base product, so far that > wasn't wanted but since this is mostly mechanical I think it might > help us in reducing the workload. IMHO the way better approch .... In this case you might indeed want to branch from the 000product from openSUSE:Factory and submit request your changes back. It seems Dominique is also fine with this. -- Adrian Schroeter email: [email protected] SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
