On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would it make sense to resort to polling at those speeds instead? Maybe > poll using a constant reoccuring hrtimer? Granted polling does not have the interrupt overhead. But I wonder how it keeps up with respect to scheduling. Might one miss activity when the kernel thread is not running? > I also remember some talk about FIQ interrupts being faster than normal > ones, but I never used them. Same here. I would really like to try them! Here is some good information: https://free-electrons.com/blog/fiq-handlers-in-the-arm-linux-kernel/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/973933/what-is-the-difference-between-fiq-and-irq-interrupt-system -- Roger Oberholtzer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
