2018-02-26 22:07 GMT+03:00 Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>: > > > On 26.02.18 08:19, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: >> 2018-02-26 0:06 GMT+03:00 Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>: >>> >>> >>>> Am 25.02.2018 um 16:37 schrieb Matwey V. Kornilov >>>> <matwey.korni...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> 25.02.2018 18:22, Matwey V. Kornilov пишет: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I am faced the issue that recent JeOS builds cannot be read by u-boot: >>>>> >>>>> ls mmc 1:2 / >>>>> Failed to mount ext2 filesystem... >>>>> ** Unrecognized filesystem type ** >>>> >>>> Hm, Now I see. Why do you use btrfs for having separate /boot partition? >>>> Is there any reason for it? >>> >>> I assume that change came with the seitch to python-kiwi. I assume the main >>> rationale would be snapshotting of /boot, so you can load old kernels. >>> >> >> /lib/modules are on the separate partition, so it won't work anyway. >> We could have united / and put dtb files onto separate EFI partition >> for snapshotting kernels. > > Nah, if you go that far, better ensure the built-in device tree from > U-Boot contains a device tree that just covers everything you need. That > way you don't need to load any dtb files. The dtb loading from /boot is > really mostly there for cases where firmware is "broken" and does not > deliver good, upstream compatible device trees. >
Well, it would be full of pain way, especially in cases when one bootloader fits multiple dtb-s (i.e. am335x). >>> I guess there is an xml tag we can provide to make /boot ext4 again? > > I've changed the xml to explicitly have a /boot partition in ext4. > Thanks. > > Alex -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org