Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package phantomjs for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2017-01-25 23:34:37
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/phantomjs (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.phantomjs.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "phantomjs"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/phantomjs/phantomjs.changes      2017-01-10 
10:43:19.460687004 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.phantomjs.new/phantomjs.changes 2017-01-25 
23:34:38.328548661 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,8 @@
+Tue Jan 24 16:38:04 UTC 2017 - [email protected]
+
+ Bump build requirement to 8GB ram.
+ The package fails to build in IBS on particular hosts with gcc crashing and
+ the only obvious difference between the failing and successful hosts is RAM
+ amount.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ phantomjs.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.fgL3mQ/_old  2017-01-25 23:34:40.380239510 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.fgL3mQ/_new  2017-01-25 23:34:40.388238305 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # spec file for package phantomjs
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2016 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
+# Copyright (c) 2017 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed

++++++ _constraints ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.fgL3mQ/_old  2017-01-25 23:34:40.436231073 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.fgL3mQ/_new  2017-01-25 23:34:40.436231073 +0100
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
                        <size unit="G">4</size>
                </disk>
                <memory>
-                       <size unit="M">4096</size>
+                       <size unit="M">8192</size>
                </memory>
        </hardware>
 </constraints>


Reply via email to