Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package calligra for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2017-02-15 10:04:57
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/calligra (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.calligra.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "calligra"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/calligra/calligra.changes        2016-12-26 
21:46:23.499212051 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.calligra.new/calligra.changes   2017-02-15 
10:04:59.672122522 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,23 @@
+Wed Feb  1 10:02:18 UTC 2017 - adam.ma...@suse.de
+
+- use individual libboost-*-devel packages instead of boost-devel
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Mon Jan 30 17:25:13 UTC 2017 - wba...@tmo.at
+
+- Add back Vc-devel-static build requirement, calligra does
+  support 1.3.0 meanwhile that is in Factory
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Tue Jan 10 13:49:51 UTC 2017 - tittiatc...@gmail.com
+
+- Update to version 3.0.0.1
+  * Frameworks based version of Calligra
+  * Tarball also includes translationes
+- No further Changelog available
+
+- Drop patches no longer required:
+  * adapt-to-libwps-0.4.patch
+  * narrowing-warning.patch
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  adapt-to-libwps-0.4.patch
  calligra-2.9.11.tar.xz
  narrowing-warning.patch

New:
----
  calligra-3.0.0.1.tar.xz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ calligra.spec ++++++
++++ 1063 lines (skipped)
++++ between /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/calligra/calligra.spec
++++ and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.calligra.new/calligra.spec

++++++ calligra-2.9.11.tar.xz -> calligra-3.0.0.1.tar.xz ++++++
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/calligra/calligra-2.9.11.tar.xz 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.calligra.new/calligra-3.0.0.1.tar.xz differ: char 
25, line 1


Reply via email to