Hello community, here is the log from the commit of package perl-PPIx-Regexp for openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2018-05-03 12:33:37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/perl-PPIx-Regexp (Old) and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.perl-PPIx-Regexp.new (New) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "perl-PPIx-Regexp" Thu May 3 12:33:37 2018 rev:39 rq:603046 version:0.058 Changes: -------- --- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/perl-PPIx-Regexp/perl-PPIx-Regexp.changes 2018-04-25 10:01:05.675408504 +0200 +++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.perl-PPIx-Regexp.new/perl-PPIx-Regexp.changes 2018-05-03 12:33:40.209527936 +0200 @@ -1,0 +2,15 @@ +Fri Apr 27 05:45:17 UTC 2018 - [email protected] + +- updated to 0.058 + see /usr/share/doc/packages/perl-PPIx-Regexp/Changes + + 0.058 2018-04-26 T. R. Wyant + Prefer /[0-9]/ over /\d/ for numeric checks. The latter can match + non-ASCII digits. + + Explain the negated POSIX character classes. Also tweak some of the + asserted explanations -- mostly for readability and parallel + construction with the negated explanations, but it turns out + [[:digit:]] is NOT equivalent to [0-9]. + +------------------------------------------------------------------- Old: ---- PPIx-Regexp-0.057.tar.gz New: ---- PPIx-Regexp-0.058.tar.gz ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Other differences: ------------------ ++++++ perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec ++++++ --- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Er86xe/_old 2018-05-03 12:33:41.165493885 +0200 +++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Er86xe/_new 2018-05-03 12:33:41.165493885 +0200 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Name: perl-PPIx-Regexp -Version: 0.057 +Version: 0.058 Release: 0 %define cpan_name PPIx-Regexp Summary: Represent a regular expression of some sort ++++++ PPIx-Regexp-0.057.tar.gz -> PPIx-Regexp-0.058.tar.gz ++++++ ++++ 1674 lines of diff (skipped)
