Hello community, here is the log from the commit of package binutils for openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2018-06-13 15:12:49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/binutils (Old) and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.binutils.new (New) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "binutils" Wed Jun 13 15:12:49 2018 rev:128 rq:613986 version:2.30 Changes: -------- --- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/binutils/binutils.changes 2018-04-04 11:01:03.917506777 +0200 +++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.binutils.new/binutils.changes 2018-06-13 15:12:52.994925146 +0200 @@ -1,0 +2,11 @@ +Mon Jun 4 09:49:37 UTC 2018 - [email protected] + +- riscv-relax-versioned-hidden.patch: RISC-V: Fix symbol address problem + with versioned symbols (PR ld/22756) + +------------------------------------------------------------------- +Sat May 12 20:57:32 UTC 2018 - [email protected] + +- Restore riscv64-elf cross prefix via symlinks + +------------------------------------------------------------------- cross-aarch64-binutils.changes: same change cross-arm-binutils.changes: same change cross-avr-binutils.changes: same change cross-epiphany-binutils.changes: same change cross-hppa-binutils.changes: same change cross-hppa64-binutils.changes: same change cross-i386-binutils.changes: same change cross-ia64-binutils.changes: same change cross-m68k-binutils.changes: same change cross-mips-binutils.changes: same change cross-ppc-binutils.changes: same change cross-ppc64-binutils.changes: same change cross-ppc64le-binutils.changes: same change cross-riscv64-binutils.changes: same change cross-rx-binutils.changes: same change cross-s390-binutils.changes: same change cross-s390x-binutils.changes: same change cross-sparc-binutils.changes: same change cross-sparc64-binutils.changes: same change cross-spu-binutils.changes: same change cross-x86_64-binutils.changes: same change New: ---- riscv-relax-versioned-hidden.patch ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Other differences: ------------------ ++++++ binutils.spec ++++++ --- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Y2wkDB/_old 2018-06-13 15:12:58.566721868 +0200 +++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Y2wkDB/_new 2018-06-13 15:12:58.570721722 +0200 @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ Patch36: binutils-pr22868.diff Patch37: riscv-relax-size.patch Patch38: riscv-relax-relocatable.patch +Patch39: riscv-relax-versioned-hidden.patch Patch90: cross-avr-nesc-as.patch Patch92: cross-avr-omit_section_dynsym.patch Patch93: cross-avr-size.patch @@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ %patch36 -p1 %patch37 -p1 %patch38 -p1 +%patch39 -p1 %if "%{TARGET}" == "avr" cp gas/config/tc-avr.h gas/config/tc-avr-nesc.h %patch90 @@ -409,6 +411,14 @@ ln -sf %{_bindir}/$T-$(basename $f) %buildroot%{_bindir}/$p-$(basename $f) done done +%endif +%if "%{TARGET}" == "riscv64" +# Instead of building duplicate binutils, add symlinks +for f in %buildroot/usr/$T/bin/* ; do + for p in riscv64-elf; do + ln -sf %{_bindir}/$T-$(basename $f) %buildroot%{_bindir}/$p-$(basename $f) + done +done %endif %if "%{TARGET}" == "avr" install -c gas-nesc/as-new $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/bin/%{TARGET_OS}-nesc-as ++++++ cross-aarch64-binutils.spec ++++++ --- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Y2wkDB/_old 2018-06-13 15:12:58.590720993 +0200 +++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Y2wkDB/_new 2018-06-13 15:12:58.594720847 +0200 @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ Patch36: binutils-pr22868.diff Patch37: riscv-relax-size.patch Patch38: riscv-relax-relocatable.patch +Patch39: riscv-relax-versioned-hidden.patch Patch90: cross-avr-nesc-as.patch Patch92: cross-avr-omit_section_dynsym.patch Patch93: cross-avr-size.patch @@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ %patch36 -p1 %patch37 -p1 %patch38 -p1 +%patch39 -p1 %if "%{TARGET}" == "avr" cp gas/config/tc-avr.h gas/config/tc-avr-nesc.h %patch90 @@ -412,6 +414,14 @@ ln -sf %{_bindir}/$T-$(basename $f) %buildroot%{_bindir}/$p-$(basename $f) done done +%endif +%if "%{TARGET}" == "riscv64" +# Instead of building duplicate binutils, add symlinks +for f in %buildroot/usr/$T/bin/* ; do + for p in riscv64-elf; do + ln -sf %{_bindir}/$T-$(basename $f) %buildroot%{_bindir}/$p-$(basename $f) + done +done %endif %if "%{TARGET}" == "avr" install -c gas-nesc/as-new $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/bin/%{TARGET_OS}-nesc-as cross-arm-binutils.spec: same change cross-avr-binutils.spec: same change cross-epiphany-binutils.spec: same change cross-hppa-binutils.spec: same change cross-hppa64-binutils.spec: same change cross-i386-binutils.spec: same change cross-ia64-binutils.spec: same change cross-m68k-binutils.spec: same change cross-mips-binutils.spec: same change cross-ppc-binutils.spec: same change cross-ppc64-binutils.spec: same change cross-ppc64le-binutils.spec: same change cross-riscv64-binutils.spec: same change cross-rx-binutils.spec: same change cross-s390-binutils.spec: same change cross-s390x-binutils.spec: same change cross-sparc-binutils.spec: same change cross-sparc64-binutils.spec: same change cross-spu-binutils.spec: same change cross-x86_64-binutils.spec: same change ++++++ riscv-relax-versioned-hidden.patch ++++++ 2018-06-03 Jim Wilson <[email protected]> PR ld/22756 * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_relax_delete_bytes): Add versioned_hidden check to code that ignores duplicate symbols. Index: binutils-2.30/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c =================================================================== --- binutils-2.30.orig/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c +++ binutils-2.30/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c @@ -2666,9 +2666,12 @@ riscv_relax_delete_bytes (bfd *abfd, ase call to SYMBOL as well. Since both __wrap_SYMBOL and SYMBOL reference the same symbol (which is __wrap_SYMBOL), but still exist as two different symbols in 'sym_hashes', we don't want to adjust - the global symbol __wrap_SYMBOL twice. - This check is only relevant when symbols are being wrapped. */ - if (link_info->wrap_hash != NULL) + the global symbol __wrap_SYMBOL twice. */ + /* The same problem occurs with symbols that are versioned_hidden, as + foo becomes an alias for foo@BAR, and hence they need the same + treatment. */ + if (link_info->wrap_hash != NULL + || sym_hash->versioned == versioned_hidden) { struct elf_link_hash_entry **cur_sym_hashes;
