Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package docker for openSUSE:Factory checked 
in at 2018-10-12 13:08:48
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/docker (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.docker.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "docker"

Fri Oct 12 13:08:48 2018 rev:81 rq:640569 version:18.06.1_ce

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/docker/docker.changes    2018-09-05 
13:46:43.130072804 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.docker.new/docker.changes       2018-10-12 
13:08:54.323452604 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,7 @@
+Mon Oct  8 06:41:21 UTC 2018 - Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
+
+- Reduce the disk footprint by recommending git-core instead of
+  hard requiring it.
+  bsc#1108038
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ docker.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.hdAnvT/_old  2018-10-12 13:08:55.987450230 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.hdAnvT/_new  2018-10-12 13:08:55.987450230 +0200
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 # license that conforms to the Open Source Definition (Version 1.9)
 # published by the Open Source Initiative.
 
-# Please submit bugfixes or comments via http://bugs.opensuse.org/
+# Please submit bugfixes or comments via https://bugs.opensuse.org/
 #
 # nodebuginfo
 
@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@
 Requires:       catatonit
 # Provides mkfs.ext4 - used by Docker when devicemapper storage driver is used
 Requires:       e2fsprogs
-Requires:       git-core >= 1.7
 Requires:       iproute2 >= 3.5
 Requires:       iptables >= 1.4
 Requires:       procps
@@ -134,6 +133,7 @@
 # configured to use lvm and the user doesn't explicitly provide a
 # different storage-driver than devicemapper
 Recommends:     lvm2 >= 2.2.89
+Recommends:     git-core >= 1.7
 Conflicts:      lxc < 1.0
 ExcludeArch:    s390 ppc
 # Make sure we build with go 1.10


Reply via email to