Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package xmlto for openSUSE:Factory checked 
in at 2019-03-27 16:12:31
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/xmlto (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.xmlto.new.25356 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "xmlto"

Wed Mar 27 16:12:31 2019 rev:33 rq:686161 version:0.0.28

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/xmlto/xmlto.changes      2019-03-13 
09:06:36.455440138 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.xmlto.new.25356/xmlto.changes   2019-03-27 
16:12:32.983650001 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,9 @@
+Mon Mar 18 15:42:45 UTC 2019 - Dominique Leuenberger <[email protected]>
+
+- Suggest instead of recommend texlive: most users are not
+  interested in texlive specific tooling- unless they install
+  texlive. xmlto is also useful without the texlice stack. So
+  instead of recommending (and this installing by default)
+  textlive, we switch to suggesting it.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ xmlto.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.im9ecJ/_old  2019-03-27 16:12:33.619649839 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.im9ecJ/_new  2019-03-27 16:12:33.619649839 +0100
@@ -37,8 +37,9 @@
 Requires:       docbook-xsl-stylesheets >= 1.56.0
 Requires:       docbook_4
 Requires:       libxslt-tools
-# For full functionality, we need passivetex.
-Recommends:     texlive-xmltex >= 2007
+# For full functionality, we need passivetex; but since most users are not 
happy with
+# getting texlive installed, we only suggest it.
+Suggests:      texlive-xmltex >= 2007
 
 %description
 This is a package for converting XML files to various formats using XSL


Reply via email to