Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package gdb for openSUSE:Factory checked in 
at 2019-09-19 15:51:08
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/gdb (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.gdb.new.7948 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "gdb"

Thu Sep 19 15:51:08 2019 rev:130 rq:731960 version:8.3

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/gdb/gdb.changes  2019-08-09 16:49:18.565507897 
+0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.gdb.new.7948/gdb.changes        2019-09-19 
15:51:14.735288380 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,22 @@
+Sat Sep 14 05:45:30 UTC 2019 - Michel Normand <[email protected]>
+
+- Add _constraints for PowerPC need more than 3.5GB disk space
+  to avoid build failure
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Tue Sep 10 15:45:17 UTC 2019 - [email protected]
+
+- Disable use of valgrind on old s390 (31bit) distros.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Fri Aug 23 16:00:18 UTC 2019 - Tom de Vries <[email protected]>
+
+- Enable librpm for version > librpm.so.3 [bsc#1145692]:
+  * Allow any librpm.so.x
+  * Fix unused variables in HAVE_LIBRPM code in
+    gdb-6.6-buildid-locate-rpm-suse.patch
+  * Add %build test to check for "zypper install <rpm-packagename>"
+    message
+- Implements jsc#ECO-368, the 2019 toolchain module update
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

New:
----
  _constraints

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ gdb.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Fbf3xT/_old  2019-09-19 15:51:18.271287661 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Fbf3xT/_new  2019-09-19 15:51:18.275287660 +0200
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 
 %if 0%{?qemu_user_space_build}
+# In a qemu_user_space_build ptrace is not supported, so we can't test gdb.
 %global _without_testsuite 1
 %endif
 %bcond_without testsuite
@@ -275,6 +276,7 @@
 %else
 BuildRequires:  texinfo
 %endif
+BuildRequires:  expect
 BuildRequires:  mpfr-devel
 BuildRequires:  ncurses-devel
 BuildRequires:  pkg-config
@@ -375,8 +377,11 @@
 %endif
 %endif
 %if 0%{?suse_version} >= 1200
+%ifnarch s390
+# s390 (for SLE12) doesn't have valgrind
 BuildRequires:  valgrind
 %endif
+%endif
 
 %endif # %%{with testsuite}
 
@@ -664,16 +669,17 @@
 
 export CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
 
-export LIBRPM=no
-if test -f /usr/%{_lib}/librpm.so.1; then
-  export LIBRPM=librpm.so.1
-fi
-if test -f /usr/%{_lib}/librpm.so.2; then
-  export LIBRPM=librpm.so.2
-fi
-if test -f /usr/%{_lib}/librpm.so.3; then
-  export LIBRPM=librpm.so.3
+export LIBRPM=$(ls -1 /usr/%{_lib}/ \
+                   | grep '^librpm.so.[0-9][0-9]*$' \
+                   | sort -V -r \
+                   | head -n 1)
+if [ "$LIBRPM" != "" ]; then
+    export LIBRPM="/usr/%{_lib}/$LIBRPM"
+    [ -f "$LIBRPM" ]
+else
+    export LIBRPM=no
 fi
+
 %ifarch %ix86 ia64 ppc ppc64 ppc64le s390 s390x x86_64 aarch64 riscv64
 %define build_multitarget 1
 %else
@@ -814,6 +820,74 @@
   cd ..
 fi
 
+# This is a build-time test, but still a test.  So, skip if we don't do tests.
+# This is relevant for %qemu_user_space_build == 1 builds, which atm is
+# the case for riscv64.
+%if %{with testsuite}
+if [ "$LIBRPM" != "no" ]; then
+    cd gdb
+    cat \
+       > hello.c \
+       <<EOF
+#include <stdio.h>
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  printf ("hello\n");
+  return 0;
+}
+EOF
+    $CC hello.c
+    libc=$(ldd a.out \
+              | grep libc.so \
+              | awk '{print $3}')
+    if readelf -SW $libc \
+           | grep -q "\.gnu_debuglink"; then
+       cat \
+           > test.exp \
+           <<EOF
+expect {
+  "(gdb) " {
+    puts "\nPASS: first prompt"
+    send "start\n"
+  }
+  default {
+    puts "\nFAIL: first prompt (eof or timeout)"
+    exit 1
+  }
+}
+expect {
+  -re {Missing separate debuginfos, use: zypper install 
glibc-debuginfo-.*\(gdb\) } {
+    puts "\nPASS: zypper install message"
+    send "quit\n"
+    exit 0
+  }
+  "(gdb) " {
+    puts "\nFAIL: zypper install message"
+    send "quit\n"
+    exit 1
+  }
+  default {
+    puts "\nFAIL: zypper install message (eof or timeout)"
+    exit 1
+  }
+}
+EOF
+       gdb="./gdb -q -nw -nx -data-directory $(pwd -P)/data-directory"
+        # Due to bsc#1146899 "gdb's zypper install message disappears with
+       # -batch", we need to use an expect test.
+       expect -c "spawn $gdb ./a.out" -f test.exp
+       rm ./test.exp
+    else
+       # If packages are not build with debuginfo, we cannot expect a zypper
+       # install message.
+       echo "UNSUPPORTED: zypper install message"
+    fi
+    rm ./hello.c ./a.out
+    cd ..
+fi
+%endif
+
 cd ..
 
 done   # fprofile

++++++ _constraints ++++++
<constraints>
  <overwrite>
    <conditions>
      <arch>ppc64</arch>
      <arch>ppc64le</arch>
    </conditions>
    <hardware>
      <disk>
        <size unit="G">4</size>
      </disk>
    </hardware>
  </overwrite>
</constraints>

++++++ gdb-6.6-buildid-locate-rpm-suse.patch ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Fbf3xT/_old  2019-09-19 15:51:18.403287634 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Fbf3xT/_new  2019-09-19 15:51:18.403287634 +0200
@@ -110,3 +110,19 @@
        }
  }
  
+diff --git a/gdb/build-id.c b/gdb/build-id.c
+index b9ff15a..75d501a 100644
+--- a/gdb/build-id.c
++++ b/gdb/build-id.c
+@@ -864,10 +864,8 @@ missing_rpm_enlist_1 (const char *filename, int 
verify_vendor)
+ #endif
+       {
+         Header h;
+-        char *debuginfo, **slot, *s, *s2;
++        char *debuginfo, **slot;
+         errmsg_t err;
+-        size_t srcrpmlen = sizeof (".src.rpm") - 1;
+-        size_t debuginfolen = sizeof ("-debuginfo") - 1;
+         rpmdbMatchIterator mi_debuginfo;
+ 
+         h = rpmdbNextIterator_p (mi);


Reply via email to