Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package ck for openSUSE:Factory checked in 
at 2019-10-09 15:20:11
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/ck (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.ck.new.2352 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "ck"

Wed Oct  9 15:20:11 2019 rev:4 rq:736403 version:0.6.0

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/ck/ck.changes    2019-06-19 21:13:36.914814518 
+0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.ck.new.2352/ck.changes  2019-10-09 
15:20:14.452377114 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Wed Oct  9 07:35:34 UTC 2019 - Martin Pluskal <[email protected]>
+
+- Disable tests as they fail with gcc9
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ ck.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.SKGR4t/_old  2019-10-09 15:20:16.068372948 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.SKGR4t/_new  2019-10-09 15:20:16.140372762 +0200
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # spec file for package ck
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2018 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
+# Copyright (c) 2019 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 # license that conforms to the Open Source Definition (Version 1.9)
 # published by the Open Source Initiative.
 
-# Please submit bugfixes or comments via http://bugs.opensuse.org/
+# Please submit bugfixes or comments via https://bugs.opensuse.org/
 #
 
 
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
 Release:        0
 Summary:        Concurrency Kit
 License:        BSD-2-Clause AND Apache-2.0
-Group:          Development/Libraries/C and C++
 URL:            http://concurrencykit.org/
 Source:         http://concurrencykit.org/releases/ck-%{version}.tar.gz
 # PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM https://github.com/concurrencykit/ck/issues/141
@@ -38,7 +37,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{libname}
 Summary:        Shared library for Concurrency Kit
-Group:          System/Libraries
 
 %description -n %{libname}
 Concurrency primitives, safe memory reclamation mechanisms and non-blocking
@@ -49,7 +47,6 @@
 
 %package devel
 Summary:        Development files for Concurrency Kit
-Group:          Development/Libraries/C and C++
 Requires:       %{libname} = %{version}
 
 %description devel
@@ -72,7 +69,7 @@
   --libdir=%{_libdir}             \
   --mandir=%{_mandir}             \
   --prefix=%{_prefix}             \
-  --cores=%jobs
+  --cores=%{jobs}
 
 # The following options will affect generated code.
 #  --enable-pointer-packing Assumes address encoding is subset of pointer range
@@ -93,7 +90,13 @@
 rm -rv %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libck.a
 
 %check
-make %{?_smp_mflags} check
+# disable tests due to their issues with gcc9
+# regressions/ck_array/validate:
+# In file included from serial.c:6:
+# ../../common.h:272:1: error: static declaration of 'gettid' follows 
non-static declaration
+#   272 | gettid(void)
+#       | ^~~~~~
+#make %{?_smp_mflags} check
 
 %post   -n %{libname} -p /sbin/ldconfig
 %postun -n %{libname} -p /sbin/ldconfig

++++++ ck-fix-j1.patch ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.SKGR4t/_old  2019-10-09 15:20:16.332372267 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.SKGR4t/_new  2019-10-09 15:20:16.340372246 +0200
@@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
  regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h | 5 +++++
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
 
-diff --git a/regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h 
b/regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h
-index eb2e6eb7..b4736052 100644
---- a/regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h
-+++ b/regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h
+Index: ck-0.6.0/regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h
+===================================================================
+--- ck-0.6.0.orig/regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h
++++ ck-0.6.0/regressions/ck_spinlock/ck_hclh.h
 @@ -2,6 +2,11 @@
  #define LOCK_NAME "ck_clh"
  #define LOCK_DEFINE static ck_spinlock_hclh_t CK_CC_CACHELINE *glob_lock; \


Reply via email to