Hello community, here is the log from the commit of package grub2 for openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2020-04-13 12:51:36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/grub2 (Old) and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.grub2.new.3248 (New) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "grub2" Mon Apr 13 12:51:36 2020 rev:218 rq:792409 version:2.04 Changes: -------- --- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/grub2/grub2.changes 2020-03-25 23:43:46.988003154 +0100 +++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.grub2.new.3248/grub2.changes 2020-04-13 12:51:41.240606329 +0200 @@ -1,0 +2,7 @@ +Tue Mar 24 08:17:33 UTC 2020 - Michael Chang <[email protected]> + +- Fix GCC 10 build fail (bsc#1158189) + * 0001-mdraid1x_linux-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-array-bounds.patch + * 0002-zfs-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-zero-length-bounds.patch + +------------------------------------------------------------------- New: ---- 0001-mdraid1x_linux-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-array-bounds.patch 0002-zfs-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-zero-length-bounds.patch ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Other differences: ------------------ ++++++ grub2.spec ++++++ --- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.H8eep8/_old 2020-04-13 12:51:43.860607470 +0200 +++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.H8eep8/_new 2020-04-13 12:51:43.864607473 +0200 @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ Patch601: risc-v-fix-computation-of-pc-relative-relocation-offset.patch Patch602: risc-v-add-clzdi2-symbol.patch Patch603: grub-install-define-default-platform-for-risc-v.patch +# Fix gcc-10 build fail +Patch610: 0001-mdraid1x_linux-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-array-bounds.patch +Patch611: 0002-zfs-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-zero-length-bounds.patch # bsc#1166409 - Grub netbooting does not search for grub.cfg files with mac # address or ip address in filename Patch700: 0001-normal-Move-common-datetime-functions-out-of-the-nor.patch @@ -594,6 +597,8 @@ %patch601 -p1 %patch602 -p1 %patch603 -p1 +%patch610 -p1 +%patch611 -p1 %patch700 -p1 %patch701 -p1 %patch702 -p1 ++++++ 0001-mdraid1x_linux-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-array-bounds.patch ++++++ >From fe8a83722bf1af7ea3949e6d96e7906407f78d5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Chang <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:52:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mdraid1x_linux: Fix gcc10 error -Werror=array-bounds We bumped into the build error while testing gcc-10 pre-release. ../../grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c: In function 'grub_mdraid_detect': ../../grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c:181:15: error: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'grub_uint16_t[0]' {aka 'short unsigned int[0]'} [-Werror=array-bounds] 181 | (char *) &sb.dev_roles[grub_le_to_cpu32 (sb.dev_number)] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../../grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c:98:17: note: while referencing 'dev_roles' 98 | grub_uint16_t dev_roles[0]; /* Role in array, or 0xffff for a spare, or 0xfffe for faulty. */ | ^~~~~~~~~ ../../grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c:127:33: note: defined here 'sb' 127 | struct grub_raid_super_1x sb; | ^~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors Apparently gcc issues the warning when trying to access sb.dev_roles array's member, since it is a zero length array as the last element of struct grub_raid_super_1x that is allocated sparsely without extra chunks for the trailing bits, so the warning looks legitimate in this regard. As the whole thing here is doing offset computation, it is undue to use syntax that would imply array member access then take address from it later. Instead we could accomplish the same thing through basic array pointer arithmetic to pacify the warning. Signed-off-by: Michael Chang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <[email protected]> --- grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c b/grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c index 7cc80d3df..c980feba4 100644 --- a/grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c +++ b/grub-core/disk/mdraid1x_linux.c @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ grub_mdraid_detect (grub_disk_t disk, return NULL; if (grub_disk_read (disk, sector, - (char *) &sb.dev_roles[grub_le_to_cpu32 (sb.dev_number)] + (char *) (sb.dev_roles + grub_le_to_cpu32 (sb.dev_number)) - (char *) &sb, sizeof (role), &role)) return NULL; -- 2.16.4 ++++++ 0002-zfs-Fix-gcc10-error-Werror-zero-length-bounds.patch ++++++ >From 30379c2280c5b4514abafc2492e081209a330cb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Chang <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:28:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] zfs: Fix gcc10 error -Werror=zero-length-bounds We bumped into the build error while testing gcc-10 pre-release. In file included from ../../include/grub/file.h:22, from ../../grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c:34: ../../grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c: In function 'zap_leaf_lookup': ../../grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c:2263:44: error: array subscript '<unknown>' is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'grub_uint16_t[0]' {aka 'short unsigned int[0]'} [-Werror=zero-length-bounds] 2263 | for (chunk = grub_zfs_to_cpu16 (l->l_hash[LEAF_HASH (blksft, h, l)], endian); ../../include/grub/types.h:241:48: note: in definition of macro 'grub_le_to_cpu16' 241 | # define grub_le_to_cpu16(x) ((grub_uint16_t) (x)) | ^ ../../grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c:2263:16: note: in expansion of macro 'grub_zfs_to_cpu16' 2263 | for (chunk = grub_zfs_to_cpu16 (l->l_hash[LEAF_HASH (blksft, h, l)], endian); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../../grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c:48: ../../include/grub/zfs/zap_leaf.h:72:16: note: while referencing 'l_hash' 72 | grub_uint16_t l_hash[0]; | ^~~~~~ Here I'd like to quote from the gcc document [1] which seems best to explain what is going on here. "Although the size of a zero-length array is zero, an array member of this kind may increase the size of the enclosing type as a result of tail padding. The offset of a zero-length array member from the beginning of the enclosing structure is the same as the offset of an array with one or more elements of the same type. The alignment of a zero-length array is the same as the alignment of its elements. Declaring zero-length arrays in other contexts, including as interior members of structure objects or as non-member objects, is discouraged. Accessing elements of zero-length arrays declared in such contexts is undefined and may be diagnosed." The l_hash[0] is apparnetly an interior member to the enclosed structure while l_entries[0] is the trailing member. And the offending code tries to access members in l_hash[0] array that triggers the diagnose. Given that the l_entries[0] is used to get proper alignment to access leaf chunks, we can accomplish the same thing through the ALIGN_UP macro thus eliminating l_entries[0] from the structure. In this way we can pacify the warning as l_hash[0] now becomes the last member to the enclosed structure. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html Signed-off-by: Michael Chang <[email protected]> --- grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c | 5 ++++- include/grub/zfs/zap_leaf.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c b/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c index 2f72e42bf..b5e10fd0b 100644 --- a/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c +++ b/grub-core/fs/zfs/zfs.c @@ -141,7 +141,10 @@ ZAP_LEAF_NUMCHUNKS (int bs) static inline zap_leaf_chunk_t * ZAP_LEAF_CHUNK (zap_leaf_phys_t *l, int bs, int idx) { - return &((zap_leaf_chunk_t *) (l->l_entries + grub_properly_aligned_t *l_entries; + + l_entries = (grub_properly_aligned_t *) ALIGN_UP((grub_addr_t)l->l_hash, sizeof (grub_properly_aligned_t)); + return &((zap_leaf_chunk_t *) (l_entries + (ZAP_LEAF_HASH_NUMENTRIES(bs) * 2) / sizeof (grub_properly_aligned_t)))[idx]; } diff --git a/include/grub/zfs/zap_leaf.h b/include/grub/zfs/zap_leaf.h index 95c67dcba..11447c166 100644 --- a/include/grub/zfs/zap_leaf.h +++ b/include/grub/zfs/zap_leaf.h @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ typedef struct zap_leaf_phys { */ grub_uint16_t l_hash[0]; - grub_properly_aligned_t l_entries[0]; } zap_leaf_phys_t; typedef union zap_leaf_chunk { -- 2.16.4
