Hello community, here is the log from the commit of package llvm7 for openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2020-07-14 07:59:35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/llvm7 (Old) and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.llvm7.new.3060 (New) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "llvm7" Tue Jul 14 07:59:35 2020 rev:23 rq:820570 version:7.0.1 Changes: -------- --- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/llvm7/llvm7.changes 2020-03-22 14:17:16.210060666 +0100 +++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.llvm7.new.3060/llvm7.changes 2020-07-14 08:00:38.838053402 +0200 @@ -1,0 +2,6 @@ +Fri Jul 10 20:27:00 UTC 2020 - Aaron Puchert <[email protected]> + +- Add fix-ppcle64-build.patch to fix ppc64le build. +- Exclude riscv64 since it fails to build. + +------------------------------------------------------------------- New: ---- fix-ppcle64-build.patch ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Other differences: ------------------ ++++++ llvm7.spec ++++++ --- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.itd0a3/_old 2020-07-14 08:00:42.222064359 +0200 +++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.itd0a3/_new 2020-07-14 08:00:42.226064372 +0200 @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ Patch32: llvm-skip-broken-float-test.patch # PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM compiler-rt-sanitizer-ipc-perm.patch -- Fix sanitizer-common build with glibc 2.31 Patch33: compiler-rt-sanitizer-ipc-perm.patch +# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM fix-ppcle64-build.patch -- Fix ppcle64 build with newer GCC +Patch34: fix-ppcle64-build.patch BuildRequires: binutils-devel >= 2.21.90 %if %{with gold} BuildRequires: binutils-gold @@ -129,6 +131,7 @@ Requires(post): update-alternatives Requires(postun): update-alternatives BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build +ExcludeArch: riscv64 # llvm does not work on s390 ExcludeArch: s390 BuildRequires: gcc @@ -512,6 +515,7 @@ %patch16 -p2 %patch26 -p1 %patch30 -p1 +%patch34 -p1 popd pushd compiler-rt-%{_relver}.src ++++++ fix-ppcle64-build.patch ++++++ >From 3185c30c54d0af5bffbff3bcfd721668d086ff10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: serge-sans-paille <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:58:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Prefer __vector over vector keyword for altivec `vector' uses the keyword-and-predefine mode from gcc, while __vector is reliably supported. As a side effect, it also makes the code consistent in its usage of __vector. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74129 --- lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp b/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp index 9034726560d..a51745697b1 100644 --- a/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp +++ b/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp @@ -2552,8 +2552,8 @@ bool Lexer::SkipBlockComment(Token &Result, const char *CurPtr, '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/', '/' }; - while (CurPtr+16 <= BufferEnd && - !vec_any_eq(*(const vector unsigned char*)CurPtr, Slashes)) + while (CurPtr + 16 <= BufferEnd && + !vec_any_eq(*(const __vector unsigned char *)CurPtr, Slashes)) CurPtr += 16; #else // Scan for '/' quickly. Many block comments are very large. -- 2.27.0
