Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package go-go-gtk for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2012-09-21 14:39:12
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/go-go-gtk (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.go-go-gtk.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "go-go-gtk", Maintainer is ""

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/go-go-gtk/go-go-gtk.changes      2012-06-12 
07:08:16.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.go-go-gtk.new/go-go-gtk.changes 2012-09-21 
14:39:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,7 @@
+Thu Sep 20 12:50:38 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- license update: BSD-3-Clause and LGPL-2.1+
+  Use ^and^ operator instead of ambigous ^;^ - also, the README.md refers
+  to ^Lesser^ rather than ^Libarary^ GPL - hence 2.1
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ go-go-gtk.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.k2QSTa/_old  2012-09-21 14:39:16.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.k2QSTa/_new  2012-09-21 14:39:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 Version:        0.0.0+git20120304
 Release:        0
 Summary:        Go bindings for GTK
-License:        BSD-3-Clause ; LGPL-2.0+
+License:        BSD-3-Clause and LGPL-2.1+
 Group:          Development/Languages/Other
 Url:            http://github.com/mattn/go-gtk
 Source0:        go-gtk-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -44,9 +44,10 @@
 %endif
 %endif
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(pango)
+%if 0%{?suse_version} >= 1100
 Recommends:     go-go-gtk-doc
+%endif
 %{go_provides}
-%{go_disable_brp_strip_static_archive}
 
 %description
 GTK bindingins for the Go programming language.
@@ -70,6 +71,8 @@
 %gobuild  gtk
 
 %install
+%{go_disable_brp_strip_static_archive}
+
 %goinstall
 %godoc
 

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to