Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package Mesa-demo for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2012-09-25 13:58:59
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/Mesa-demo (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.Mesa-demo.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "Mesa-demo", Maintainer is ""

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/Mesa-demo/Mesa-demo.changes      2012-05-14 
16:16:34.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.Mesa-demo.new/Mesa-demo.changes 2012-09-25 
14:18:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,11 @@
+Tue Sep 25 02:42:55 UTC 2012 - sndir...@suse.com
+
+- reverted previous change; seems this is no longer necessary 
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Mon Sep 24 15:50:13 UTC 2012 - sndir...@suse.com
+
+- fixed build by replacing these strange osdemo{,16,32} scripts
+  by the proper binaries
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ Mesa-demo.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.CdGgn7/_old  2012-09-25 14:18:11.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.CdGgn7/_new  2012-09-25 14:18:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -29,11 +29,11 @@
 Patch0:         u_mesa-demos_missing-libs.diff
 BuildRequires:  autoconf >= 2.59
 BuildRequires:  automake
-BuildRequires:  libtool
 BuildRequires:  freeglut-devel
 BuildRequires:  gcc-c++
 BuildRequires:  glew-devel
 BuildRequires:  libexpat-devel
+BuildRequires:  libtool
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(gl)
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(glew)
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
 
 %package x
 Summary:        GLX-based demos
+Group:          System/Libraries
 
 %description x
 This package contains some common GLX-based demos.

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-commit+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-commit+h...@opensuse.org

Reply via email to