Hello community,
here is the log from the commit of package rubygem-ruby-shadow for
openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2012-11-16 14:33:14
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rubygem-ruby-shadow (Old)
and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rubygem-ruby-shadow.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "rubygem-ruby-shadow", Maintainer is "cth...@suse.com"
Changes:
--------
New Changes file:
--- /dev/null 2012-10-22 00:44:18.403455820 +0200
+++
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rubygem-ruby-shadow.new/rubygem-ruby-shadow.changes
2012-11-16 14:33:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Thu Nov 15 09:31:40 UTC 2012 - bo...@steki.net
+
+- updated License from wrongly selected MIT to
+ author approved BSD-3-Clause (or Public Domain)
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Tue Oct 23 23:08:25 UTC 2012 - bo...@steki.net
+
+- initial packaging 2.1.4
+
New:
----
README.LICENSE
ruby-shadow-2.1.4.gem
rubygem-ruby-shadow.changes
rubygem-ruby-shadow.spec
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Other differences:
------------------
++++++ rubygem-ruby-shadow.spec ++++++
#
# spec file for package ruby-shadow
#
# Copyright (c) 2012 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
#
# All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
# remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
# upon. The license for this file, and modifications and additions to the
# file, is the same license as for the pristine package itself (unless the
# license for the pristine package is not an Open Source License, in which
# case the license is the MIT License). An "Open Source License" is a
# license that conforms to the Open Source Definition (Version 1.9)
# published by the Open Source Initiative.
# Please submit bugfixes or comments via http://bugs.opensuse.org/
#
Name: rubygem-ruby-shadow
Version: 2.1.4
Release: 0
%define mod_name ruby-shadow
%define mod_full_name %{mod_name}-%{version}
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
BuildRequires: ruby-macros >= 1
Requires: ruby >= 1.8
BuildRequires: ruby-devel >= 1.8
Url: https://github.com/apalmblad/ruby-shadow
Source: %{mod_full_name}.gem
Source1: README.LICENSE
Summary: *nix Shadow Password Module
# License really is "Free for any use with your own risk!"
# Look in README.LICENSE for clarification
License: BSD-3-Clause
Group: Development/Languages/Ruby
%description
This module provides access to shadow passwords on Linux and Solaris
%package doc
Summary: RDoc documentation for %{mod_name}
Group: Development/Languages/Ruby
Requires: %{name} = %{version}
%description doc
Documentation generated at gem installation time.
Usually in RDoc and RI formats.
%prep
#gem_unpack
#if you need patches, apply them here and replace the # with a % sign in the
surrounding lines
#gem_build
%build
cp %{SOURCE1} README.LICENSE
%install
%gem_install -f
%gem_cleanup
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README.LICENSE
%{_libdir}/ruby/gems/%{rb_ver}/cache/%{mod_full_name}.gem
%{_libdir}/ruby/gems/%{rb_ver}/gems/%{mod_full_name}/
%{_libdir}/ruby/gems/%{rb_ver}/specifications/%{mod_full_name}.gemspec
%files doc
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc %{_libdir}/ruby/gems/%{rb_ver}/doc/%{mod_full_name}/
%changelog
++++++ README.LICENSE ++++++
Delivered-To: bo...@steki.net
Received: by 10.76.75.133 with SMTP id c5csp761308oaw;
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.154.227 with SMTP id vr3mr1661714igb.43.1352961583924;
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gtt...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com
[209.85.223.176])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lt8si3750336igc.16.2012.11.14.22.39.42
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gtt...@gmail.com designates
209.85.223.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.176;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
gtt...@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender)
smtp.mail=gtt...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k11so1652852iea.7
for <bo...@steki.net>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:39:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=87o+vw0/BhhfNv+hWSrjNfTYUyV6NTiS09n8aRveb8M=;
b=T2VqJM/gH1YuH9D40Tb9FJ85scpdVWVFbEv0cutB2ZlzBS2gQwCYijnMOXux79w5A4
xx57MuY/O62+4B39PTNm1m6VHS6NgvcZXW3SZDruhDD7Ogap51hZaCtU6Ih2OLgTJVTY
aJDdSZ3XswM9PjhiCFyvnq2YsqWcik3vqTU8Do49jQh2lr3gar760xY3bedjFt7+p/6e
Hie4aD/ST+gx0/UrGqBCum1EPSRYXVVcncKPsrwZGjwMgk1lVddWsy6wP103QZuqDX/z
+0Qn575OammkoXJI8BCqyT9fraSxxELcfG/0IKu1BTRpjRFKO8xqvsBnN1+ESHrotH0e
Ml/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.77.166 with SMTP id t6mr74460igw.72.1352961581787; Wed, 14
Nov 2012 22:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.38.36 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.38.36 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:39:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<CAHisY=N7eefyLcAbT9xS=ess85o05mdogfd0gbvt7wv6umz...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHisY=p7qbc20jdsdtcvh03blbqj3wz1_oc8ap4s58ww-3o...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHisY=N7eefyLcAbT9xS=ess85o05mdogfd0gbvt7wv6umz...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:39:41 +0900
Message-ID: <CAF0Yrd4=uufr7t32ntaz7-twylsx0zsetdewmtn2suvczc7...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: ruby-shadow licensing question
From: "Takaaki T." <gtt...@gmail.com>
To: Boris Manojlovic <bo...@steki.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3baff77a28b604ce82eab9
--e89a8f3baff77a28b604ce82eab9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Dear Boris,
I think I intended to make it public domain. Is this acceptable? If I need
to choose one of the licenses, I'd like to use BSD-3.
Best regards,
--
Takaaki Tateishi
2012/11/15 1:39 "Boris Manojlovic" <bo...@steki.net>:
> please find question posted to your original email address forwarded
> to latest known one
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Boris Manojlovic <bo...@steki.net>
> Date: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:08 PM
> Subject: ruby-shadow licensing question
> To: "Takaaki.Tateishi" <tt...@jaist.ac.jp>
>
>
> Hello Takaaki
>
> can you please elaborate which exactly license you are using for your
> package ruby-shadow as it is not really clear enough for packaging
> purposes of openSUSE project
>
> I would like to point you to http://spdx.org/licenses/ which lists
> most of compliant open source licenses, so if it is possible to name
> it from that list i would really be grateful for that.
>
> ---
> Copyright (C) 1998-1999 Takaaki Tateishi <tt...@jaist.ac.jp>
> Modified at: <1999/8/19 06:47:14 by ttate>
> License: Free for any use with your own risk!
>
>
--e89a8f3baff77a28b604ce82eab9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p>Dear Boris,</p>
<p>I think I intended to make it public domain. Is this acceptable? If I ne=
ed to choose one of the licenses, I'd like to use BSD-3.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br>
--<br>
Takaaki Tateishi</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">2012/11/15 1:39 "Boris Manojlovic" <=
;<a href=3D"mailto:bo...@steki.net"; target=3D"_blank">bo...@steki.net</a>&g=
t;:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
please find question posted to your original email address forwarded<br>
to latest known one<br>
<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Boris Manojlovic <<a href=3D"mailto:bo...@steki.net"; target=3D"_bl=
ank">bo...@steki.net</a>><br>
Date: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:08 PM<br>
Subject: ruby-shadow licensing question<br>
To: "Takaaki.Tateishi" <<a href=3D"mailto:tt...@jaist.ac.jp"; t=
arget=3D"_blank">tt...@jaist.ac.jp</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
Hello Takaaki<br>
<br>
can you please elaborate which exactly license you are using for your<br>
package ruby-shadow as it is not really clear enough for packaging<br>
purposes of openSUSE project<br>
<br>
I would like to point you to <a href=3D"http://spdx.org/licenses/"; target=
=3D"_blank">http://spdx.org/licenses/</a> which lists<br>
most of compliant open source licenses, so if it is possible to name<br>
it from that list i would really be grateful for that.<br>
<br>
---<br>
Copyright (C) 1998-1999 Takaaki Tateishi <<a href=3D"mailto:ttate@jaist.=
ac.jp" target=3D"_blank">tt...@jaist.ac.jp</a>><br>
Modified at: <1999/8/19 06:47:14 by ttate><br>
License: Free for any use with your own risk!<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>
--e89a8f3baff77a28b604ce82eab9--
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-commit+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-commit+h...@opensuse.org
