Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package kapidox for openSUSE:Factory checked 
in at 2015-06-23 12:05:51
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/kapidox (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.kapidox.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "kapidox"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/kapidox/kapidox.changes  2015-05-11 
19:48:07.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.kapidox.new/kapidox.changes     2015-06-23 
12:05:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,7 @@
+Sun Jun  7 19:07:10 UTC 2015 - hrvoje.sen...@gmail.com
+
+- Update to 5.11.0
+  * For more details please see:
+    https://www.kde.org/announcements/kde-frameworks-5.11.0.php
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  kapidox-5.10.0.tar.xz

New:
----
  kapidox-5.11.0.tar.xz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ kapidox.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.UtlI3x/_old  2015-06-23 12:05:52.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.UtlI3x/_new  2015-06-23 12:05:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@
 #
 
 
-%define _tar_path 5.10
+%define _tar_path 5.11
 Name:           kapidox
-Version:        5.10.0
+Version:        5.11.0
 Release:        0
 Requires:       doxygen
 BuildRequires:  fdupes

++++++ kapidox-5.10.0.tar.xz -> kapidox-5.11.0.tar.xz ++++++
diff -urN '--exclude=CVS' '--exclude=.cvsignore' '--exclude=.svn' 
'--exclude=.svnignore' old/kapidox-5.10.0/setup.py new/kapidox-5.11.0/setup.py
--- old/kapidox-5.10.0/setup.py 2015-04-10 09:34:14.000000000 +0200
+++ new/kapidox-5.11.0/setup.py 2015-05-09 01:24:30.000000000 +0200
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 setup(
         name='kapidox',
-        version='5.10.0',
+        version='5.11.0',
         description='KDE API documentation generation tools',
         maintainer = 'Aurélien Gâteau',
         maintainer_email = 'agat...@kde.org',


Reply via email to