Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package texlive for openSUSE:Factory checked 
in at 2016-04-22 16:22:27
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/texlive (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.texlive.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "texlive"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/texlive/texlive.changes  2016-03-17 
16:47:19.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.texlive.new/texlive.changes     2016-04-22 
16:22:28.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,30 @@
+Wed Apr 13 13:59:41 UTC 2016 - [email protected]
+
+- Use some more system libraries
+- Avoid to prerequire own packages at build time
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Wed Apr 13 09:21:49 UTC 2016 - [email protected]
+
+- Use system libmpfr
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Tue Apr 12 16:04:19 UTC 2016 - [email protected]
+
+- Work around broken perl_gen_filelist rpm macro
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Wed Mar 30 14:32:20 UTC 2016 - [email protected]
+
+- Change Recommends for binary packages on their main packages
+  to Requires(pre) even if we get a dependency loop as otherwise
+  some developers to not get it right.
+- Add some basic Recommends for binary packages to have an
+  basic environment around.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Mon Mar 21 13:57:38 UTC 2016 - [email protected]
+
+- Really require the library packages with texive-bin-devel 
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ texlive.spec ++++++
++++ 1851 lines (skipped)
++++ between /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/texlive/texlive.spec
++++ and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.texlive.new/texlive.spec


Reply via email to