Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package gnome-documents for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2016-08-25 09:51:15
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/gnome-documents (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.gnome-documents.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "gnome-documents"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/gnome-documents/gnome-documents.changes  
2016-08-22 10:49:36.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.gnome-documents.new/gnome-documents.changes     
2016-08-25 09:51:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,8 @@
+Mon Aug 22 12:23:19 UTC 2016 - fezh...@suse.com
+
+- Drop pdf-converter-modify.patch.
+  Drop unoconv or libreoffice recommends:
+  Upstream uses LOKDocView instead of unoconv to handle ODF, OOXML,
+  etc now, see bgo#753686 for more details (bnc#902922).
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -16,0 +25,5 @@
+Thu Apr 14 06:43:22 UTC 2016 - ty...@suse.com
+
+- Update to GNOME 3.20 Fate#318572
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -213,0 +227,7 @@
+Wed Jan 21 10:42:03 UTC 2015 - ty...@suse.com
+
+- Add patch pdf-converter-modify.patch for bnc#902922:
+  Replace the unoconv with libreoffice when converting files to
+  pdf format.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ gnome-documents.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.vu8XdO/_old  2016-08-25 09:51:18.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.vu8XdO/_new  2016-08-25 09:51:18.000000000 +0200
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@
 # If available, we query the Online Miners via dbus.
 Recommends:     dbus(org.gnome.OnlineMiners.GData)
 # A lot of document formats are handled using unoconv.
-Recommends:     unoconv
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
 %{glib2_gsettings_schema_requires}
 


Reply via email to