Hi, On Freitag, 16. März 2007, Alexey Eremenko wrote: > > I think, we should consider how we can improve the text basis. > > Someone (we, others?) should read it carefully and remove any > > strange sentences, typos, make it more consistent, etc. > > > > What do you think? > > This is something I do constantly for my material. I proof read it > once-in-a-while, update it constantly, improve my XML skills and > code, improve material itself, and try to keep it high-quality > overall.
Yes, I appreciate your work. :) However, proofreading should not be done by yourself. This should be done by another person. From my experience with writing documentation, never underestimate a good proofreader (thanks Rebecca!). A person how is not emotionally connected with a text can see things that you can not see. For example, after I wrote some text I give my text to my collegues for feedback. I can not proofread my own text, it's like a "blind spot". > On the other side, LfL material written by Novell is > unfinished/pre-alpha quality. Please don't get this personally. Right, I agree. Don't worry. :) > This includes : "KDE Configuration for Administrators" and > "Interoperability: Accessing Linux Filesystems from Windows" This is the reason why I asked if we should start something like a "proofreading" or feedback round. I think this would improve the overall quality. Bye, Tom -- Thomas Schraitle ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX GmbH >o) Documentation Specialist Maxfeldstrasse 5 /\\ 90409 Nuernberg _\_v http://en.opensuse.org/Documentation_Team --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
