On Monday 16 April 2007 12:18, jdd wrote: > Rebecca Walter wrote: > > In the past, we had consistently used installation source, but some > > things happened that cost us that consistency. So now we need to make an > > informed decision so we can encourage consistency again. > > so the question is: do we keep "installation source" or use an other > wording? >
Exactly. > the problem comes from the "source" word, it can be confused with the > programm source, often writen only "sources". > > This given, very few users need or even know about progamm sources, so > this problem may be secondary It is a concern, definitely. Do you have other suggestions? What wording would you prefer and why? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
