On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> What I don't understand: Why do you want to support YUM now and wanted
> to drop APT? Everybody I know uses APT instead of YUM, because YUM is
> very slow, when refreshing package lists e.g. Even most Red Hat/ Fedora
> users are fed up with YUM...
We are not using YUM -- we are using the metadata format that YUM uses as
well. Calling those installation repors "YUM sources" might be a bit
misleading. Actually they should be called "RPM Metadata" or RepoMD or
something like that...
Regards
Christoph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
