Hans-Peter Jansen schrieb: > Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2006 13:19 schrieb houghi: > >>I looked just at the two screenshots provided in the bugreport and I >>don't see any difference between the two. Perhaps you need to >>describe better what the differences is that one needs to look at. > > > The kerning is very different. Look at the distance before and after the > first "e" of "Bearbeiten", also the "s" of "Lesezeichen". Both appear > outstanding unlike those from 9.3. > > Here's an * where I think, distances are to big: > 9.3: B*earbei*ten A*ns*i*c*ht Gehe z*u Les*ez*eic*hen > 10.0: B*e*arbe*ite*n An*s*i*cht G*eh*e zu L*e*s*eze*i*ch*e*n > > But maybe, it's just me, and everybody else is fine with it. I'm not a > typographer, but it must hurt in their eyes like it does in mine..
This is funny. While I agree that the rendering in 10.0 is more inconsistent, I strongly disagree that the distances are too large. I would want the large distances between all characters. But then again, I'm the only one who thinks it is important to be able to distinguish between rn and m. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
