Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Jens Siebert wrote:
>> Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Jens Siebert wrote:
> 
>>> You have requested a feature here (you know - additional work from other
>>> people), talking about errors without exactly showing the errors.
>>
>> I requested WHAT? Doesn't anybody READ anymore? Read again please:
> 
> Yes. But this time: just to fool you, not to guide you.
> 
>> I need this for an older program which doesn't compile with gcc 4.x.
> 
>> Does this sound like a request to you?
> 
> What else?
> 
>> Do you read "I request a gcc 3.x package immediately" out of this?
> 
> Not "immediately", but "request".
> 
>> a simple question
> 
> OK. So you got a complex answer to a so-called "simple" question which
> you had wanted to better ignore.

Not complex, totally unnecessary... Simple and helpful answer would have
sufficed...

> Sorry that i wasted my time...
> 
>> Details were totally uninteresting in this case. But it seems that
>> some people need to bash around without reason on everything that
>> possibly could come from a newbie because it sounds simple.
> 
> Xou seem to be a much more crazy fool that I am under my cover.
> Do you like to get the address of my default psychiatrist?
> I won't give it to you; it is my wife & family.
> 
>>> The usual penalty for that is 101% ignorance, so please feel good now or
>>> eat the big letters.
>>
>> Yeah sure... Ignorance is bliss...
> 
> You simply should have obeyed some of the big letters, and nobody would
> have shouted you being ignorant.
> 
> But with this extent and this stupid reaction, take this thread as closed.

Yup, I'll do. Because it leads to nowhere...

> 
> You can earn the chance again to get personal answers from me if you
> re-qualify to ask questions.

I really don't know if I want that...

> But I bet you do not understand...
> 

Greetings

Jens Siebert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to