On Tuesday 21 March 2006 20:57, houghi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:29:19PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
> > Although ,I Agree with your rant, and found this sudden move to
> > MONO (.NET) or whatever very bad,disappointing, and unnecessary
> > (specially in the middle of the distro development, and having
> > previous, well tested,mature software,that works.) I think you are
> > missing the real point, it doesn't matter if the file extension is
> > pl or exe or whatever, the most important thing is **how it
> > works**.
>
> That is naturaly the first important thing. The second is some kind
> of logic and calling things *.exe points to a Microsoft enviroment,
> no matter how wrong that is.
Can someone please explain how it makes sense to use a framework
intended for writing code that runs on multiple operating systems
(Mono) to write tools used specifically on Linux, and on a specific
distro at that? I'm a die-hard Java programmer, but I would never
consider writing a SUSE package updater in Java...
--
======================================================
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
======================================================
"Greater coherence cannot be achieved. Not even the
Netherlanders have managed this." -Anton Webern
======================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]