On Tuesday 21 March 2006 20:57, houghi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:29:19PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
> > Although ,I Agree with your rant, and found this sudden move to
> > MONO (.NET) or whatever very bad,disappointing, and unnecessary
> > (specially in the middle of the distro development, and having
> > previous, well tested,mature software,that works.) I think you are
> > missing the real point, it doesn't matter if the file extension is
> > pl or exe or whatever, the most important thing is **how it
> > works**.
>
> That is naturaly the first important thing. The second is some kind
> of logic and calling things *.exe points to a Microsoft enviroment,
> no matter how wrong that is.

Can someone please explain how it makes sense to use a framework 
intended for writing code that runs on multiple operating systems 
(Mono) to write tools used specifically on Linux, and on a specific 
distro at that?  I'm a die-hard Java programmer, but I would never 
consider writing a SUSE package updater in Java...

-- 
  ======================================================
   Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
  ======================================================
   "Greater coherence cannot be achieved.  Not even the
    Netherlanders have managed this."  -Anton Webern
  ======================================================

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to