On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
>On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 05:55:25PM +0100, David Bolt wrote:
>> >After verification, I will put 0.27 online at SF and remove the one above.
>>
>> The 0.27 script failed again.
>
>This is getting weird. I have tried it and it worked. One other person
>emailed me that 0.27 worked. So why did it not work with you? Just to get
>the obvious out of the way, you ran ./makeSUSEdvd and not just
>makeSUSEdvd? The second could run a previous installed version.
Since I don't have it installed, and I don't have . in my path, I have
to use ./makeSUSEdvd.
>Sorry to ask this, but I would hate to look for solutions if there not is
>a real problem.
That I can understand.
>That said, I previously tried to run it without the META an KEY lines and
>firt it did not work. Now it did.
>
>I have tried 3 times yesterday and again today and it worked, so I am
>really curious why it did work with me and the other person and not with
>you.
I don't know. Removing the 'r' from here:
# MOUNT_ISO : mount the ISOs and copy them to one directory
MOUNT_ISO ()
{
for DIR in `ls $HERE/*.iso -Ar`
# remove this letter # ------------^
do
test ! -d TEMP_DIR && mkdir TEMP_DIR
and then rebuilding the DVD made an image that booted correctly. With it
there, it failed.
Regards,
David Bolt
--
Member of Team Acorn checking nodes at 50 Mnodes/s: http://www.distributed.net/
AMD1800 1Gb WinXP/SUSE 9.3 | AMD2400 256Mb SuSE 9.0 | A3010 4Mb RISCOS 3.11
AMD2400(32) 768Mb SUSE 10.0 | Falcon 14Mb TOS 4.02 | A4000 4Mb RISCOS 3.11
AMD2600(64) 512Mb SUSE 10.0 | | RPC600 129Mb RISCOS 3.6
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
