On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:45:36PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If you could do this at the right time as hardlinks to the factory tree that > > would be really smart. In that case all mirror servers that have the > > factory > > Factory and our 10.1 tree are not hardlinked, they are internally > different. So, it's not possible to do this. I tried to persuade our > build guys to sync factory and 10.1 so that it would be hardlinks - > but then we would need to sync after the release of 10.1 factory > completely :-( > > > tree could sync without any extra file to transfer saving about 30GB net > > transfer per mirror server. > > > > Suppose Eberhard would agree with me here. > > Everybody would - but it does not fit into the way we work, where we > have separate 10.1 and "FACTORY" trees - even if those have the same > sources, just are build separately,
You may want to explain what exactly is the reason that you build everything twice from the same sources at all. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
pgpQrSpJpY7JF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
