Hi, On 2006-05-05 at 12:56:12 +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote (shortened):
> > If you think that's useful (I agree at the moment) to ship SeaMonkey in > > 32bit version on x86-64 please file a bugreport as enhancement. > > (But the three examples from above should really be solved from their > > vendors!) > > What about packages that require gtkmozembed ? (liferea [1] being one > example) gtkmozembed is in mozilla-xulrunner nowadays. The devel package is gecko-sdk which is only available online because of size constraints. > [1] feedreader: http://liferea.sourceforge.net/ > http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/rpm-navigation.php?cat=Network/liferea/ > > Since mozilla has been withdrawn from 10.1 and "replaced" by > seamonkey, there is no gtkmozembed available any more. > From what I've seen, Seamonkey doesn't provide a 1:1 compatible form > of gtkmozembed - at least I haven't been able to build liferea with it. > > The MozillaFirefox packages don't ship a -devel, so I cannot use those > to build gecko support in liferea (although liferea supports doing so). > > What about shipping a MozillaFirefox-devel and a MozillaFirefox with > gtkmozembed ? I want to keep Firefox a leaf package without such dependencies. > Note that "too much work" would be a valid reason not to do it, I > mean, I just throw that question out in the wild, but I'm very much > aware that MozillaFirefox & friends are very tedious pieces of > software to package. > > I'm just naively assuming that the headers, .so symlinks and pkgconfig > files are being installed anyway and just being discarded by the spec > file at the moment, which means it would not be too much work to > include them in a -devel subpackage. Wolfgang -- SUSE LINUX GmbH -o) Tel: +49-(0)911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstr. 5 /\\ Fax: +49-(0)911-740 53 679 90409 Nuernberg, Germany _\_v --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
