On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:51:19PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 12:43 schrieb houghi:
> 
> > I still get the same error. I now have:
> >         #Remove keys in content
> >     grep -v ^META $CD_DIR/content > $CD_DIR/content.bak
> >         mv $CD_DIR/content.bak $CD_DIR/content
> >         grep -v ^KEY $CD_DIR/content > $CD_DIR/content.bak
> >         mv $CD_DIR/content.bak $CD_DIR/content
> 
> Does all content have to be signed by the same key? If not, why do you resign 
> also files, which content did not change (e.g. selection files)?

Mainly lazyness. Otherwise I would also have to check wich files are
changed and wich ones are not, making it more complicating then needed, I
think.
For me it is easier to just sign all, instead of just some and some not.
The reason that I rather do all is that way I won't forget anything. :-)

> >         #Set the key
> >         LOCAL_KEY=`gpg --list-secret-keys|grep "^sec"|sed -e
> > 's/.*\///;s/.*//g;'|head -n 1` gpg --export -a >
> > $CD_DIR/gpg-pubkey-${LOCAL_KEY}.asc
> 
> This gives a file like gpg-pubkey-6344CBC1.asc
> But on the CDs the keys look like this:
> 
> gpg-pubkey-9c800aca-40d8063e.asc

I know. No idea wether this is relevant. How do I get a key as above?
 

> >         # Sign files in /suse/setup/descr/
> >         for FILE in `ls $CD_DIR/suse/setup/descr/`
> >         do
> >                 echo "META SHA1 $(cd $CD_DIR/suse/setup/descr/ && sha1sum
> > ${FILE})" >> $CD_DIR/content done
> >         #Sign *.asc files
> >         for FILE in `ls $CD_DIR|grep ^gpg-pubkey*`
> >         do
> >                 echo "KEY SHA1 $(cd $CD_DIR && sha1sum ${FILE})">>
> > $CD_DIR/content done
> Here the same question: is it neccessary to resign all the files? Or would it 
> be enough to sign only the files makeSuSEdvd changed?

Same answer. You might gain time, but loose simplicity. (Unless there is a
reason that it won't work otherwise)

 
> Btw:
> gpg --detach-sign -u $LOCAL_KEY -a $CD_DIR/media.1/products
> 
> creates products.sig not products.asc on my SL 9.3

Without the -a it does. With the -a it makes a products.asc

[EMAIL PROTECTED] : touch test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : l test*
-rw-------  1 houghi users 6523 2006-04-30 20:13 test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : gpg --detach-sign -u 70660424 test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : l test*
-rw-------  1 houghi users 6523 2006-04-30 20:13 test
-rw-r--r--  1 houghi users  280 2006-05-06 00:10 test.sig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : gpg --detach-sign -u 70660424 -a test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : l test*
-rw-------  1 houghi users 6523 2006-04-30 20:13 test
-rw-r--r--  1 houghi users  481 2006-05-06 00:11 test.asc
-rw-r--r--  1 houghi users  280 2006-05-06 00:10 test.sig

Or at least that is how it should be. I don't have a 9.3 installed, so I
can't verify. Anybody else?

houghi
-- 
Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es 
ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk
und Arbeit,  und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun                                 
                                        - Johannes Müller-Elmau

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to