-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> The Monday 2006-05-15 at 13:37 +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> > > > > > I would like to report why I object to 10.1 package manager.
> > > > > Sadly , You are not the only one. :-(
> > > > I used y2pmsh instead. Very comfortably at the "solving" stage.
> > > Does it run from the install dvd automatically, when doing the upgrade?
> > No. Just from within the old system.
> Oh, my :-(
>
> I have never upgraded a full system that way.
> > Christoph had posted a sample session in february.
>
> Could you be more precise? I wasn't watching this list then. Title of the
> email, for instance...

I went through all of Feb and the first of March and could not find it.  I
would like to see the post.  I did find one reference to using y2pmsh
upgrade.

Thanks,

- --
Boyd Gerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ZENEZ   1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah  84047
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQFEaHOXVtBjDid73eYRAp/qAJkBMmV0QxEzB10jHYBFp7/9GONeAQCfbtmb
Xb4AaW7J0xuKAW4apzbNQGI=
=oJzc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to