Andreas Hanke wrote: > Volker Kuhlmann schrieb: >> This thread is about what's annoying about the package management. .exe >> processes are. > > .exe processes are neither specific to the package management nor can > they be influenced by the people who are designing the package > management architecture for SUSE Linux.
So you say that the SUSE package management designers were forced to use mono .exe files regardless of whether it makes sense? Interesting conspiracy theory. > Try a Mono or, maybe even better, an ECMA mailing list. Sorry, I googled for "ecma mailing list exe" and found nothing relevant. However, some sites seem to suggest .exe is not the only recommended suffix for .NET code. >> The .exe extension is specific to the mswindows platform >> (can one say of legendary notoriety?). > > No it isn't. Examples please? (Except mono, which seems to be a reimplementation of windows-only .NET code. And no, being able to use wine for some .exe files doesn't make them cross-platform either.) Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
