On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:53:40AM -0600, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote: > I think the two above should be split. I personally never use DHCP but do > a lot with DNS. In fact I remove DHCP from most if not all my systems. > This would force me to have on my systems DHCP. In the DNS Server > would/could include SPF. SPF and DSN Server would for my uses be a better > choice.
I asume it still will be possible to install and/or remove individual packages. I also think it will be impossible to have a good situation for each and every person, because that would mean having an almost limitless amount of combinations. Having each and every service seperated might not be wanted, because of complexity it will bring. If the selection happens in the same way as it happens now, deselecting DHCP should not e a real problem. I can imagine that most people who use a DHCP server will also use a DNS server and perhaps also the other way around. -- houghi Please to not toppost http://houghi.org > You tried, and you failed, so the lesson is, never try. - Homer J. Simpson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
