On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 05:27:33AM +0200, Andreas Hanke wrote:
> To answer your question: Factory is not guaranteed to be always consistent.

Good.

> See also: http://en.opensuse.org/Factory
> 
> For example, it can happen that a package is updated in such a way that
> dependent packages have to be updated as well, but the updated packages
> of the dependent packages don't build.

Well, that's fine if it really is just a build problem. But that's not
always the case. Sometimes (as in the udev split) providing the new
packages is just forgotten.

> This will probably always happen from time to time and disappear again
> shortly afterwards.

Well, if "shortly" covers an interval of more thant one week, ok.

I have one (small/not-so-small) wish regarding these inconsistencies:
Could the repo be checked automatically after new packages have been
posted or packages have been replaced and the result be posted to this
list?

 ciao
      Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to