"Dominique Leuenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was also very concerned when I saw the 'most annoying bugs' list > today (as I epxected Alpha 3). > The worst that can happen to openSUSE is having (again) a release with > bugs like the updater in 10.1. Even though they are fixed now, it's > still around and poeple installing without an internet connection most > obviosuly run into it.
For me Alphas have a lower quality than Betas have and I they might be broken sometimes in ways that would never be acceptable for a final release. > If the schedule for 10.2 should be kept like this (which I think it > should) then we should try to put bugs away instead of adding > last-minute-features and packages. Some might be solved with new > packages, some might not. The X11 change was planned for a long time but it was indeed a bit tight at the end. Btw. in general my plan is: * Release AlphaN * Break everything;-) (I mean: put new stuff in that could be broken) * Stabilize again in time for our AlphaNplus (after two weeks) * Stabilize furthr for the next public Alpha Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgpZWaDv87iLf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
