> You and the author of that page forget one thing. Its impossible to set > a reply to if the list adds one.
Only if the list manager is dumb enough to replace an existing reply-to:, and thus overrides the explicit request of the email's author. I fear those who anally bash standards which don't discuss the problem, let alone address it, and those who try to address a common problem will never come to an agreement. This is one way to ensure consistency locally: :0 fhw * ^List-[a-z]*:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | formail -I"Reply-To: [email protected]" Btw thanks to Felix Miata for a beautiful argumentation! <stir>That should pretty much demolish http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html ...</stir> Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
