Rajko M a écrit :
Complains here are about Reply To field, but the list server
configuration is actually the problem.
Rjko, you are actually highjacking a thread :-) There is a
very long thread on an other list on this very subject :-)
but let's try to find an answer :-)
With present configuration where private addresses are sent out with
mails to all subscribers
this is mandatory in the RFC for mails. if not the mail
would be anonymous, not a good practice
the archives are an other problem.
Henne, if you read this, one thing that can be done and is
done on my LUG http://www.culte.org/listes/archivage.html
two things are proposed:
* use of an "X-No-Archive: yes" header that makes your mail
not to be archived at all
* Its possible on this list to ask to have the adress masked
(in the archives only) by a mail to the list server. I don't
know of the system used, but I could give you privately the
mail of the list owner, a very brilliant Linux practician
(Eric Marsden).
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
