Hello,

Am Samstag, 19. August 2006 10:22 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
> Christian Boltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >> The question  is how to "open" FATE in such a way that all of us
> >> can use it, it was not designed for such a large group...
> >
> > Where do you see a problem? Server load? Permission handling? ...?
>
> Permission handling: We do not want our partners to see each others
> request for our enterprise products - and you shouldn't either see
> there's.  

Sounds like "novellonly" group in bugzilla and "reporter can always 
access his reports".

However, I'm a bit wondering why feature requests need to be 
top-secret ;-)

> I guess that everything coming in through openSUSE can be 
> public.

ACK.

> > Maybe you can provide read-only access as a first step...
>
> Yes, would be an option.  But it still means I need a way to flag
> specific features as public.

Hmm, the question is if you want it to be "closed unless open" or "open 
unless closed". (I prefer "open unless closed" because it tends to have 
more open feature requests.)

If I got the concept of partner.fate right, the easiest way seems to be 
to have an openSUSE group to "open" feature requests. (Needless to say 
that _everybody_ should be in the openSUSE group by default.)
The only disadvantage is that this uses the "closed unless open" way to 
work which I don't really like ;-)


Regards,

Christian Boltz

PS: The more I think about this, I ask myself why bugzilla and FATE are 
    different applications. They have much in common, and the 
    differences might be good features for each other.
    -> what about merging them to FATEzilla? ;-)

-- 
    1.-4.9.2006: Weinfest in Insheim
Pig Slip, Hifi-Delity, AH-Band, Frank Petersen und die Deafen Goblins
spielen bei der Landjugend.
Mehr Infos: www.Landjugend-Insheim.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to