On 06/10/26 20:52 (GMT-0600) Joel Wampler apparently typed: > On 10/26/06, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's more troubling is the fact that something has changed with font >> rendering and it's a degradation. >> With identical font configuration (in the KDE Control Center), my 10.0 >> installation is clearly superior in an A-B comparison. This was not so >> under Alpha5, where they were indistinguishable. >> Does anyone know what might be different in this configuration? Fonts >> that rendered very clearly under Alpha5 now show unmistakable artifacts >> that considerably reduce their legibility and attractiveness. Is it >> possible the hint interpreter has been disabled and the simple-minded >> anti-aliasing has been substituted? If so, I'll go on record saying >> that this is a bad idea, since the TrueType hinting is far superior to >> anti-aliasing. > I second the font issue... Alpha 5 had beautiful font rendering, > unfortunately Beta 1 is really really bad... I even tried a brand new > account to see if wiping all the settings would help and it didn't. Oh and > I'm using Gnome so apparently its not limited to just one environment... On http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/Font/fonts-face-index-full.html I don't see a significant difference. I'm running 1400x1050 ATM on factory, 1600x1200 normally on 10.0. What are you guys running? -- "The Lord is my strength and my shield; my heart trusts in him, and I am helped." Psalm 28:7 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
