-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Hanke wrote: > Juan Erbes schrieb: >> Why I know if one of the 320 files is referenced to libstdc++.la? > > Only those from the PackMan repo and other non-SUSE repos have > references to libstdc++.la, and only if they are build for distros < > 10.2. Once there is a 10.2 PackMan repo with packages specifically built > for 10.2, you don't need to worry any more.
What makes you think that ? AFAIK no one at Packman (nor do I with my packages) removes the .la files from the -devel packages, not even if they are for >= 10.2. Referencing libstdc++.la (c|sh)ould be seen as a bug (at least I've been bashed for filing that on bugzilla, or rather, for asking where the heck libstdc++.la is on 10.2 ^^). If it is, it should be discussed with those package maintainers at Packman. cheers - -- -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ /\\ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFSHR2r3NMWliFcXcRAqCpAJ93QKB8L9vyOw0VwPrYF+A7TXDlqQCgndmv +bTbfCY/Cy1gp4k7PSzHNXw= =qOyU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
