On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:25:14PM -0300, Juan Erbes wrote: > 2006/11/6, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >Marcus, > > > >On Monday 06 November 2006 07:38, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > >> ... > >> > >> just for the logic: > >> ext3 - obsolete > > > >Are you serious? You really believe ext3 is obsolete? That seems odd, > >given how widely used it is. Even FAT is not obsolete and it's archaic. > >Perhaps you mean "obsolescent?" I.e., in the process of becoming > >obsolete but not yet there. > > > >Anyway, could you clarify this statement? > > > > > > I believe ext3 is obsolete, because it resembles the old times, when I > power on the computer to send a email, and I have only 5 minutes to > leave my house, and the system just this day uses 15 minutes for the > montly fsck. > With Reiserfs I forgot completely this problem, and the system is > usable any time I need it. > For a desktop computer, I mean that ext3 is not a better option than > reiserfs. Ext3 is retro.
Then just use reiserfs for your machine. :) Ciao, Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
