On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:25:52PM -0200, Alexey Eremenko wrote: > Hi all ! > > The utilities suuplied with openSUSE 10.2 BETA2 (x86) do not conform > to the LSB 3.1 standard.
Uhmm, you don't understand what this standard is for... > Here are few examples: > > Testing "vim" editor. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lsb-app-testkit/bin> ./lsbappchk /bin/vi This does not make sense. Nobody ever claimed /bin/vi from the distribution is a binary that must be runnable on every LSB compliant system but it must run _only_ on the distribution it was supplied with. Thus running lsbappchk does only make sense when it is run on an application that is intended to be distributed to run on _any_ LSB compliant system. > Testing "cat" utility. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lsb-app-testkit/bin> ./lsbappchk /bin/cat Dito. > Testing "ls" utility. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lsb-app-testkit/bin> ./lsbappchk /bin/ls Dito. > Other packages have similar problems. There is no problem. > I don't want to open 5000 bug reports - per every package. That wouldn't make sense because then someone else would have to close 5000 bug reports with RESOLVED INVALID. > Any ideas? Run the tool on applications where it does make sense. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
pgpWRgYMH6yLC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
