On Monday 04 December 2006 07:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > ... > > > I'm far from the typical sex-negative, puritanical American. I just > > don't go for children. > > Now I think you're exageraging a lot!
Exaggerating what? You know nothing about me. I'm not even attracted to women, for crying out loud. > The site that was visible on > his screenshot was talking about teen and you just offend him of > being after children? Maybe he just turned twenty, then it's normal > to be affected by this age. Well, I did check out the site before writing--for about two seconds. Anyway, in the United States if you're over 18 and have sex with someone under 18, that's statutory rape (the actual age of consent varies from state to state, I think). If the parties are both under or over the age of consent, then it's considered consensual. I'm not saying the laws are rational, just that they're the laws here and now. > On the other hand, if you're 50, it's > less likely... but accusing him of being after children is plain > unfair and rough! This was not any kind of accusation. It was about that person disclosing something that, depending on where he or she lives, which I gather is the Netherlands, might be a felony. If the site displays pornographic images of people who are actually are under age, then it would be felonious to patronize that site in the United States. I know nothing about the laws in the Netherlands or anywhere else. > Dominique Randall Schulz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
