* Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jan 19. 2007 12:36]: [...] > For instance bash is often listed as being part > of a minimal installation pattern for a normal system installation. This is > wrong! For _using_ an installed system bash is not needed. It is obviously > needed for some other packages to run their startup scripts and stuff like > that. But this is solved by the other packages drawing in bash by > dependencies. This also applies to glibc and more packages. If you list them > explicitely you have made the mess yourself.
>From a theoretical POV, I agree and see your point. >From a practical POV, I'd rather have YaST tell me "removing bash breaks your base system" instead of listing (possibly hundreds) of packages depending on bash. Klaus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
