* J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jan 22. 2007 18:05]: > > > > We could define the functionality "text editor" as a requirement, fulfilled > > by any of the mentioned packages. So you can't have a minimal system without > > an editor but you're still free to choose your own. > > Think about the consequences - for years we have assured all and sundry that > the one thing in life that you can depend on is that any unix install will > include vi. To suddenly yank that rug of security out from under an > unsuspecting world would be outrageous.
*g* Well, the default should stay with 'vi' , I agree. The question is, do we want to enforce this default or allow alternatives ? Klaus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
