Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue 20 Feb 2007 23:05:12 NZDT +1300, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> > so resorting to lvm should be the proposed solution, not >> > repartitionning with less than 15 partitions :-) >> >> Yes, we can change the wording ;-). The problem is that all solutions >> to support more than 15 partitions in an automatic way might cause >> problems ;-( > > IMHO it would be good to mention as well that the switch to libata is > necessary, and that unfortunately Linux doesn't support more than 15 > partitions with libata. Proposed solutions are [...] > > Woudln't it be better to give some choice? E.g. "Use kernel parameter > ... (not recommended), use lvm" Are there any other fundamental choices? > Isn't evms becoming popular?
I added lvm to our text as other option. There's no kernel parameter AFAIK, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgpANshJ6EpVQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
