On Monday 26 February 2007 4:21 pm, Christoph Thiel wrote: > The way I see it, most projects actually ship their own in-tree copy of > ElementTree (e.g. smart does). So, most of the stuff should be alright -- > or needs to be "ported" to 2.5's xml.etree anyways. So, for now, I'd > suggest we stick with the current sitation -- without python-elementtree. > If it turns out, there is actual demand for it, we will have to reconsider.
That's cool. I'll send patches downstream to the projects using my code. Thanks, -- James Oakley [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
