On Saturday 03 March 2007 15:22:21 Rajko M. wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2007 09:02, Alberto Passalacqua wrote: > > I'm a bit critical about the _one_day_ bug testing because I think it's > > too short to examine the bugs of something complex like a distribution. > > ... > > > I personally prefer shorter meetings in multiple days than 24 hours > > meeting where everyone has to wait for the moment which interests him. > > But of course this is an opinion. > > While IRC meetings are cooncentrated they exclude all people that are not > in right time zone. With present number of active users that is not good. I > would prefer one thread on this list that will announce start of triage and > than separate threads for each bug.
That's an argument against a meeting _time_, but not really against a meeting day. If it's a bug triage weekend (or any given couple of days), then different people can be on at different times. And particularly on a weekend, people's sleeping patterns vary quite a bit, so I don't think it's a problem. Like I said though anyway, this is a tried, tested and proven method: many other projects have these, and they work tremendously well. Kind thoughts, -- Francis Giannaros Website: http://francis.giannaros.org IRC: apokryphos on irc.freenode.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
